Thursday, January 29, 2009

Super Bowl Pick

I don't know if you have heard about this, but there is a big game coming up on Sunday February 1st. It's called the Super Bowl and it matches the Pittsburgh Steelers with the Arizona Cardinals in Tampa, Florida.

Lines current as of 5:00p mst on Sunday January 29th, 2009 and from oddsmaker.com

Steelers (-7) vs Cardinals

For all intents and purposes the Steelers should win this game. They have more experience and a tougher defense, they have won a Super Bowl before (several in fact), the Cardinals on the other hand are on a Cub like streak of post season failure.

With two weeks of Super Bowl coverage the Cards still seem to be getting overlooked. Everyone who is picking them is only picking them because they are scared that everyone else is picking the Steelers. Everyone says "watch out for the Cardinals" but are they really even thinking that? It seems that it is just lip service. Who actually thinks they will win?

Honestly though, with how many people the Cards have shocked I am surprised the line is as high as it, I mean a touchdown favorite? Against a team that can score in bunches? Who has not once since not covered? And the Steelers are one "Troy Polamalu is a freaking stud" interception (against a rookie quarterback from Delaware) from not covering against Baltimore and a Santonio Holmes punt return touchdown (against a punter who had like the best game in the history of punters the week before) from not covering against San Diego. Doesn't Vegas have a gun to your head to take the points. How can you not? I can't really find it in my heart of hearts not to take the points.

But to my actual pick.

Look I already said the Steelers should win this game. I have picked against the Cards at every turn and they have burned me at each and every one of those. I want to take the Cardinals but I am afraid they will lose if I pick them, I want them to win because I want the Lombardi trophy to be live west of the Mississippi for the first time since 1998. I am tired of it. I want the entire western US to be vindicated in its professional football standing and for its entire reputation to be improved. Not even that, but can you imagine how many story lines would come out of the Cardinals winning this game?

  • Cardinals win their first Super Bowl ever.
  • Larry Fitzgerald puts on the greatest playoff performance possibly ever.
  • Anquan Boldin and Todd Haley yell at each other out of joy.
  • Kurt Warner rides off into the sunset as a Super Bowl champion a la John Elway.
  • Ken Whisenhunt beats his former team.
  • Finally offense trumps defense

Where does it end? I really do not want to ruin that by picking the Cardinals. But man I have this feeling, I have this sneaking suspicion that they just might do it. I think they will, I am totally talking myself into this pick. Do I curse the Cardinals and go with my gut? Or do I go with my other gut and take the Steelers. I haven't been this conflicted since I stole two marbles from preschool, oh screw it: Cardinals 27 Steelers 24

Friday, January 23, 2009

On Exclamation Points

Exclamation points were once a valuable part of the written English language. An exclamation point's very presence defined an entire grouping of sentences, the exclamatory sentence was defined by the very existence of the exclamation point. They were used to express strong feelings, sentiments, or emotions. They were once my favorite form of punctuation. They were heads and shoulders above the comma and period and they were definitely more exciting to write then the question mark. The exclamation point allowed you to show passion in writing, it showed that you were not simply declaring something, you were exclaiming it.

The problem is that the exclamation point has become a mere triviality. It has been overused to the point of gluttony. We, as an English language society, have become exclamation point gluttons. Not only has it been overused, but it has been misused. It's not only that we are gluttons, but we are doing it incorrectly. We are eating with our nose. Think about it, do you even think the other person is excited anymore when you read an exclamation point? How many times have you seen a sentence that ended in seven or eight exclamation points. We have completely devalued the exclamation point as anything exciting. Its overuse has completely destroyed the very nature of itself. It makes me mad. I would love to once again use the exclamation point.

For this to happen however we need to stop using the exclamation point. We need to make people forget about the exclamation point. Then and only then when the value of the exclamation point has been restored, when we once again hunger for the excitement it brings, then and only then will I once again be able to comfortably exclaim things in print. I implore you, the English writing language, to stop using the exclamation point. I am done with it, I no longer will use an exclamation point in any sort of writing. I refuse until its value is restored. And to bid farewell to the exclamation point I leave you and it with this.

Stop using exclamation points!

Thursday, January 22, 2009

On Yuppies; an exposé on yuppies in the Salt Lake Valley

A yuppie is a rather clumsy word for a younger person usually in their 20 or 30s who is professionally driven and lives in a major urban center, a "young urban professional." Salt Lake City has evolved itself into an urban environment and along with that urbanity has come with it yuppies. They are generally well intentioned but many times lack the social graces to interact with people other than other yuppies. This can lead you to believe that all yuppies are pompous and arrogant, which is not true. The truth is that most yuppies are pompous and arrogant. Yuppies shouldn't be feared however, they are harmless and are actually a valuable part to any urban center. The most confusing thing about a yuppie is not discerning whether or not they are a yuppie but exactly what time of yuppie you are dealing with. There are several different types of yuppies, each with their own characteristics and features that discern them from other yuppies. The following is a guide to different types of yuppies you may run across around the Salt Lake Valley:

The Mormon Yuppie

A very common yuppie, especially south of 21st South. You will tend to see mostly males in this category as the females are home tending for the children. Should you see one of these in the wild with their mate, you will undoubtedly see the children as well. These children are usually not well behaved and are fond of throwing sugar packets on the ground. The Mormon yuppie tends to work in financial fields such as banking, accounting, or insurance. White collared shirts with red or blue ties are very common, and are almost never seen in patterned shirts. The Mormon yuppie tends to look down on most people but is polite about it because they are very non-confrontational.

Average Number of Children: 3.7
Automobile of choice: Ford Expedition

Beverage of choice: Diet Coke
They tip: 12%
Mexican restaurant frequented for lunch: Cafe Rio

The Dorky Yuppie

The Dorky Yuppie is the kindest of the yuppies. There is less disdain for people below them than most yuppies but this is counterbalanced with unwaveringly bad social skills. They have not fit in to their surroundings for sometime but usually have skills that other people value. Jobs these yuppies have include information systems and medical technology. Golf shirts with khakis are common, as are Gap jeans. Dress is informal and modest, but watch out for "Hawaiian Shirt Friday."

Average Number of Children: 1.8
Automobile of choice: Toyota Corolla

Beverage of choice: flavored lemonade
They tip: 18%
Mexican restaurant frequented for lunch: Costa Vida


The Traditional Yuppie


This yuppie is very common. They usually have a high level of education. They are actually very adept at social interaction, especially with other yuppies but they also have the smoothest interactions with other non-yuppies. Although not universally true, they tend to be fans of good food and wine. Often occupy something called a “McMansion.” They are prone to usage of nannies and babysitters. Common jobs include doctors, professors, and entrepreneurs. These yuppies are very good at throwing parties, although the parties tend to be unentertaining to all except other traditional yuppies.


Average Number of Children: 2.1
Automobile of choice: Subaru Outback

Beverage of choice: Pinot Grigio
They tip: 25%
Mexican restaurant frequented for lunch: Barbacoa


The Skier Yuppie


The skier yuppie, also known as the Snowbird yuppie is a yuppie who thrives in winter conditions but is often not seen in the valley. They seem to be enamored with something called a “Bluebird Day.” Skiing is the preferred pastime although some outliers prefer snowboarding. Skiing also dominates conversation after skiing. Beards are preferred by the males. Most have some sort of goggle tan, also called “raccoon eyes.” Careers are harder to discern among skier yuppies because they are so often observed away from work. Suspiciously hibernating during the warmer seasons.


Average Number of Children: 1.8
Automobile of choice: Toyota 4Runner

Beverage of Choice: microbrews
They tip: 18%
Mexican restaurant frequented for lunch: Lonestar Taqueria


The Hip Yuppie

This yuppie is very thin and usually has an equally thin partner. They are commonly seen on scooters in the warmer months. In the cooler months scarves are very popular. Males tend to wear suit jackets with t-shirts. Females are fond of skinny jeans and larger sunglasses. They usually have an office in some place that used to be a loft apartment. Common fields include architecture, internet start ups, and art galleries. They also tend to live in buildings that used to be offices. They often have tattoos but are usually invisible while clothed. 5 o’clock shadows are common amongst the males. They are known to frequent independent films.

Average Number of Children: 0.7
Automobile of choice: Toyota Prius or vintage bicycle

Beverage of choice: Perrier
They tip: 20%
Mexican restaurant frequented for lunch: Sushi, Mexican isn't hip enough.

The Rocker Yuppie

This is the hardest type of yuppie to discern because of their similarity to people similar to them with no money. These yuppies tend not to work as much, or are at least very good at making it seem as though they do not work as much. They have a lot of time on their hands and seemingly informal careers evidenced by beers and margaritas at lunches that last more than the usually allotted lunch time and the frequency of body modification. Common careers include tattoo artists, hair stylists, and writers. Tattoos, rock and roll boots, and wallets with chains are common.

Average Number of Children: 0.4
Automobile of choice: Vintage Chevrolet

Beverage of choice: Pabst Blue Ribbon
They tip: 20%
Mexican restaurant frequented for lunch: Red Iguana


The Almost Yuppie


These yuppies are just not quite yuppies yet. They are very smart and have limitless potential but usually they are still stuck in college unable to achieve their full yuppie potential, they tend to be act like a yuppie in all areas except the lack of money. Almost yuppies are intelligent, evidenced by good marks in school however they sometimes struggle with emotional problems. They are very politically charged and feel as though they can change the world. Over the top optimism and an inability to hold liquor are common.


Average Number of Children: 0.2
Automobile of choice: Volkswagen Jetta

Beverage of choice: Coca-Cola
They tip: 17.5%
Mexican restaurant frequented for lunch: Rubio’s

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

Reasons you want to watch the Super Bowl (other than the fact that it is the freaking Super Bowl)

1. Larry Fitzgerald - Check here, here, here, here,or here to figure out that the national media is at least enamored with Larry Fitzgerald. And honestly for good reason - he is really, really good. His craft is an entertaining one in and of itself, but when someone is performing that craft at a highest level, it is a thing of beauty. It's not really a sports thing - okay it is, but this guy is amazing, to say the least.

2. Kurt Warner coming back from the dead - Ok, obviously he wasn't really dead, but this guy has a totally rejuvenated career for like a 67th time. That's a story line enough.

3. The St. Louis Rams - Remember those fun St. Louis Rams days when he came out of the Arena League and the Greatest Show on Turf won that Super Bowl. Yeah, me too that was awesome and this Cardinal team is almost as entertaining. They have so many weapons and the same, albeit older quarterback pulling the trigger. Offense is much better to watch then defense and any curmudgeon who tells you otherwise is lying.

4. The University of Phoenix Stadium - You might think this is the home field for the University of Phoenix, then you remember that it's the University of Phoenix and you think that as much bad there is to say about the corporatization of sports sometimes it's just funny.

5. Pittsburgh vs Arizona - No not the Steelers vs. the Cardinals, the City of Pittsburgh vs. the City of Phoenix. As I type this it is 79 degrees in Phoenix and it is 20 degrees in Pittsburgh. For those keeping track at home that is like a 59 degree difference. 59 degrees! That is just the tip of the iceberg. I mean are they similar in anyway?
  • West vs. East
  • Northeast vs. Southwest
  • traditonal vs. new
  • old line steel city vs. emerging metropolis
  • river city vs. desert city
  • cheesesteak vs. tacos.
  • Jeff Goldblum vs. David Spade
  • Steven Spielberg vs. George A. Romero
(Random note: on the wikpedia page of famous people from the Pittsburgh area there were zero porn stars, on the wikipedia page of famous people from the Phoenix area there were six. I am not judging, I am just saying).

Friday, January 16, 2009

AFC Championship

Chargers at Steelers

The Steelers impressed me a lot, on both sides of the ball. They kept the Darren Sproles experience in check (on the ground at least). The offense moved the ball, especially on the ground. Willie Parker seems to be back. They just looked good. What really struck me was their ability to answer. I thought they were in trouble after the Bolts scored on that first drive, but they just took a deep breath and got back to work. They didn't allow the Charger run game to get going and they got a few big plays- the punt return by Holmes and a bunch of big runs.

Ravens at Titans

The Ravens on the other hand played a tight game with the Titans. I just love this Baltimore team. The defense is stellar and Joe Flacco is hitting enough throws to put them in the position to win the game. Who would have thought a Blue Hen would win two (two!) playoff games. The only thing that scares me was the fact the fact that Tennessee left points (and possessions for that matter) on the field. They kept shooting themselves in the foot which allowed Baltimore to finish out the game. But the fact remains that they still finished out the game.

Lines current as of 1:30a mst on Sunday January 18th, 2009 and from oddsmaker.com

--Ravens (+6) at Steelers

I want to pick the Steelers, I really do. They are the more complete team. They have a better quarterback, they have a better running back, they have better wide receivers, and they have at least as good of a defense as Baltimore, and they have been there before. But honestly I refuse to bet against this Baltimore team. I can't do it. I can't take my hard earned money and put six (six!) against a Pittsburgh team that doesn't really win big against good teams. They absolutely played well against San Diego, but I totally don't believe this team can win by six against a team that plays as solidly as the Ravens. I don't know if I can trust Joe Flacco, but that is what everyone said the first two weeks. I love the Raven's gameplan against Tennesee, they didn't let the rookie lose the game for them (hell they didn't even let him throw the ball inside their own 40). But when he Flacco had to step up and hit throws he did - against a stellar Titan defense - there is no reason to think he won't keep doing it. The defense will give Concussion Roethilsberger trouble. I don't see him getting going. Willie Parker will get some yards but the Raven defense won't break. It will be higher scoring than some people thing, but it will still be a battle. Baltimore has a "team of destiny" thing going and the more you think about it, the more they remind you of that 2000 team, which for those keeping track at home, won the Super Bowl. Ravens 20 Steelers 18

NFC Championship

So last week was a little bad. Okay really bad. Alright awful. 1 correct 3 incorrect. But you know, we persevere around here. We pick ourselves up, we dust ourselves off, and we go out there, we recap last week, and we pick the championship rounds.

Cardinals at Panthers

Arizona did it again. Seriously Carolina? You couldn't beat the {freaking} Arizona Cardinals at home. Not only did you not beat the Cardinals, you got smoked by the Cardinals. And by the way, did anyone have the Cardinals? No they did not. I certainly didn't but I mean they came out of nowhere.The {freaking} Cardinals. They have burned me twice. Kurt Warner is something like 245 years old and he is just playing pitch and catch with every single weapon he has on the field. And Larry Fitzgerald is a stud - just amazing. Not only was the Cardinal offense clicking but what happened to Jake Delhomme? Five interceptions? 5? Cinco? How does this happen? But it's not all Delhomme's fault, the Cardinal defense is playing incredibly. They are playing about as well as possible - they are forcing turnovers (see above) and just playing really solidly. And Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie is a playmaker. He is a super star in the making.

Eagles at Giants

Pants it is acceptable to place a loaded, unlocked gun in:
1. Jeans
2. Khakis
3. Chinos
4. Wool trousers
5. Tuxedo pants

Pants it is unacceptable to place a loaded, unlocked gun in:
1. Sweatpants

Players who would have helped the Giants win this game who shot themselves in the leg after violating the rules above:
1. Plaxico Burress

The Giant offense was so pedestrian without Plax, and it especially showed against the Eagles. They couldn't muster a touchdown, Eli looked average, at best. They just weren't that good. On the other side, McNabb made the plays when he had to, he kept hitting 3rd down throws, he ran for a touchdown and more-or-less willed his team to a victory. So that leaves a NFC Conference Championship game of the Eagles traveling to Arizona to take on the Cardinals.

Lines current as of 1:30a mst on Sunday January 18th, 2009 and from oddsmaker.com

--Eagles (-3 1/2) at Cardinals

The Cardinals have have burned me twice so far. I want to pick them, I really do. I want to say they won me over, I want Kurt Warner to get back to the Super Bowl and then ride off into the sunset to save underpriveladged youth. I want a warm weather team to win a Super Bowl. I want a team with an offense to win. I want the cliche of defense wins championships to be shut up for at least a year. I want the NFC West to be vindicated for being the punching bag of the NFL. I want the national media to remember that their are teams that are good, interesting, and worth talking about west of the Mississippi. I want it so bad. I don't think it will happen. The Eagles should win this game. I don't know how Kurt Warner will be able to handle the pressure the Eagles will bring. I think the run game will be slowed up which will put even more pressure on Warner, and I think that will let the Eagles be more aggressive. On the other sideline I think McNabb has a whole no one believes in me thing going. He got benched, he didn't know there was a tie rule and he hasn't been to Super Bowl without Terrell Owens. He wants to vindicate himself on all fronts and really prove himself as an elite quarterback. The Cardinals will get their points but I don't know that it will be enough. Westbrook was tame last week but I think he makes a few big plays this time and McNabb does enough to get the Eagles back to the Super Bowl. Eagles 30 Cardinals 24

Friday, January 9, 2009

NFL Playoff Picks Second Round

Lines current as of 4:30p mst on Friday January 9th, 2009 and from oddsmaker.com

AFC

--Ravens at Titans (-3)

I can't imagine this game not being ugly. Two really good defenses, two average offenses led by two average quarterbacks who are opposite ends of the spectrum in terms of their careers. The only way this gets exciting is if Ed Reed touches the ball. (Speaking of that, I have heard enough about Ed Reed lately, he is great - we get it. He is getting as much pub in the sports world as the governor of Illinois is getting in the fake news world. Blagojevich is slimy and has bad hair, Ed Reed is a ballhawk and really good; enough already). Gad now I am angry. Anyways the game is in Nashville where the Titans have already beaten Baltimore but that won't make much of a difference. The Raven run game does a tiny bit more than the Titan run game, both quarterbacks play poorly have at least 1 interception (maybe/probably more). Look for a bunch of field goals and the Ravens win a close, ugly one. Ravens 19 Titans 16

--Chargers (+6) at Pittsburgh

If I am Pittsburgh, I am really scared of this game. The Chargers are smoking hot, their karma from the beginning of the season is finally on the other end of the spectrum, and Darren Sproles is doing his best Tazmanian Devil impersonation. San Diego's defense is finally playing up to their potential. Pittsburgh already beat San Diego at home, but only by 1. It is supposed to stop snowing on Saturday in Pittsburgh and the game is Sunday. So it should be cold, but clear. The Steelers needed the rest from the bye and they will be ready, Heinz field will be rocking. I want to take the Steelers, they won't win by 6. It will be close. For sure take the points, and I know this is going to bite me but I will take the Chargers. I am internally yelling at myself but Chargers 24 Steelers 23

NFC

--Cardinals (+9 1/2) at Panthers

I love the Panthers, I love their run game, I love Steve Smith (a Ute). I love their defense, I like their coach, they are home, the weather is going to suck, Delhomme probably won't have to throw the ball more than like 15 times, I can't say enough. The Cardinals surprised me against Atlanta, but Carolina is a better team than Atlanta, Jake Delhomme is better than Matt Ryan. I don't see the Cardinals offense getting going. 9 1/2 is a lot to lay for a defensive run oriented team. Still though, I can't help but take the Cats. Panthers 31 Cardinals 13

--Eagles (+4) at Giants

The Eagles are hot. If Westbrook makes 3 big plays the Eagles can win this. The Eagles have to feel good after dominating Dallas to get into the playoffs then getting a big win on the road at Minnesota. But the Giants are too good to let this win slip away, they want to prove that they can win without Plaxico and Eli wants to prove that he better than his brother (I have no proof of this, I just can't imagine it isn't true). This will be close, 3 or 4 points. Let's hope it's 4. Giants 20 Eagles 16

College Football Final Ramblings

SO the mighty Utes finished #2 in the AP Poll, with 16 first place votes and #4 in the USA Today/Coaches Poll with 1 first place vote (from Kyle Whittingham). The coaches are obligated to vote for the winner of the BCS National Championship Game won by Florida in an unconvincing albeit effective victory over Oklahoma. (What do you call what Kyle did? He said he was "looking out for his players" but do you call that civil disobedience? poll disobedience? in any case good on ya coach). The Gators finished #1 in both polls. As a self admitted and absolute total Utah homer I am a little annoyed that there was not a split national championship, but the whole kit and kaboodle is mythical anyway and there is so much buzz about the college football post season that it really doesn't matter that they aren't #1 in the polls.

But to my main point: The Mountain West is really really good and really really deserving of a BCS automatic bid. The following: final ranking in the AP, wins versus final AP rankings (by ranking only); conference title winner in italics

Mountain West:

Utah: #2 - wins over #6, #7, #18, and #25
Texas Christian: #7 -wins over #11 and #25
Brigham Young: #25

=no automatic bid

Big East

Cincinnatti: #17 -win over #23
West Virginia #23

=automatic bid

ACC

Virginia Tech: #15 - win over #21
Florida State: #21

=automatic bid

Big 10

Penn State: #8 - wins over #9, #18, and #24
Ohio State: #9 - win over #24
Michigan State: #24

=automatic bid



I see a problem too.


Tuesday, January 6, 2009

NFL Playoff Picks (in hindsight)

I was 3-1 in my first round of playoff picks but only 2-2 against the spread, which is respectable, I suppose. I really thought Miami would keep it closer. They were at home but they somehow forgot not turning it over is a good idea. I totally underestimated the Cardinals, they hunkered down and stopped Michael Turner, which hurt the Falcons. Arizona had a swagger they hadn't had in a while and won one for their fans at home. The Eagles outplayed the Vikings with help from wouldn't you know, a bad interception (returned for a touchdown) by Tarvaris Jackson. I said earlier that as long as Adrian Peterson didn't go nuts (a respectable, but not wild 20 for 83, with 2 touchdowns) the Eagles should cover, he didn't and they did. I said the Chargers game was tough to call, I went with the Chargers and wouldn't you know, they won at home, in overtime. Wow I am impressive.

Second round playoff picks to come soon.

Sugar Bowl

Well I don't know much what to say about the Sugar Bowl. I mean the Utes absolutely dominated in a 31-17 victory. The offense was sparkling scoring 21 straight points to open the first quarter. Alabama closed the gap with a punt return touchdown (one of Utah's two mistakes) and then a touchdown on a short field after a Brian Johnson fumble (the other mistake). Aside from those, the Alabama offense just couldn't move the ball. The Utes ended with 8 sacks, compare that with 17 total all season. Not to mention the two interceptions Utah had compare that with John Parker Wilson's 8 all season. The Utes were better prepared, schematically and emotionally. They were more fired up, they were better coached and 100% outplayed their SEC counterparts. Congratulations to the Ute team, coaches, and the entire Ute Nation.

But... don't get me started on the debate as to where the Utes should end up in the final polls. Just look here; here; here; or here and you'll get an idea on which side of the fence I sit (I am just a little biased). No matter which way the polls shake out this Utah team will go down as one of the best in Utah history, in Mountain West history, and well in national history, honestly they have a resume to compare with most teams. It matter-eth not to me (sort of) that the Utes won't get crowned mythical national champions. The Utes and everyone of their fans can hang their hats on the fact that they didn't lose. They beat who they played. They had close games, they had blowouts, and they had everything in between. This season was great, it was beyond great. Everyone who followed this team knows this and that is enough to be proud of.